2026 North County
San Diego Voter Guide
Our priorities, on your ballot
Justice Works organizes for compassionate policy that affirms dignity and promotes the flourishing of all people. The candidate portion of this guide looks at where every candidate on your November 3 ballot, from Congress down to city council, stands on our five priorities: affordable housing, food security, police accountability, LGBTQIA+ rights, and immigration.
We also share where Justice Works stands on the state, county, and local measures on your ballot. 69 candidates across 32 contests. Every finding below is a position a candidate has stated or a vote a candidate has cast, with a source. Where the record is empty, it says so. We do not tell you who to vote for.
Justice Works and Oceanside Sanctuary do not endorse, oppose, or rate any candidate. Our positions on ballot measures, and the reasons for them, are in the measures section. Nothing about a candidate is inferred from party registration, occupation, endorsement, or general disposition.
The five priorities
Affordable housing is a human right and the cornerstone of every person’s wellbeing. Our pantry is the safety net beneath the safety net, helping our community meet their basic needs when the cost of living becomes untenable. Holding our public safety officials, like the Police Department, accountable to fair and equitable practices ensures all people are treated with justice and grace in the criminal justice system. Protecting our immigrant, queer and trans neighbors is what keeps “dignity for all people” meaning everyone, without exception. Affordable housing, food security, police accountability, LGBTQIA+ rights, and immigration rights are our top five priorities.
Make sure you can vote in this election
None of what follows counts for anything if you are not on the rolls. Registering in California takes about two minutes online, and it is worth checking even if you are sure — a move across town, a name change or a few quiet elections can all knock a registration loose.
Vote.org is a nonpartisan 501(c)(3) nonprofit. It does not support or oppose any candidate or party, and it does not ask you who you are voting for. You can also go straight to the state at registertovote.ca.gov, or ask the San Diego County Registrar of Voters about anything specific to your ballot.
- October 5
- Vote-by-mail ballots start going out to every registered voter in San Diego County. Early voting opens the same day.
- October 19
- Last day to register online, by mail or in person and be sent a ballot the ordinary way. This is the deadline that matters.
- October 20 – November 3
- Miss the deadline and you can still register and vote in person, through Election Day, at any San Diego County vote center or the Registrar of Voters in Kearny Mesa. California calls this conditional voter registration.
Candidates on your ballot
Every finding below comes from the public record — council and board minutes, legislative databases, filed candidate statements, campaign websites, and local press — compiled in late August 2026, or from a candidate’s own answers to the Justice Works questionnaire, marked “Stated to Justice Works” and dated. Each carries an evidence mark. Quotes are verbatim; where a summary is ours rather than a candidate’s words, it says so. Justice Works has sent every candidate the questionnaire on these five priorities and updates this page as answers arrive. Last updated October 12, 2026.
San Diego County Board of Supervisors · District 5#
Supports streamlining permits and building near jobs and transit. In December 2021 she voted to endorse the "Our Neighborhood Voices" initiative, a proposed constitutional amendment letting local zoning override state housing law, saying state legislation "takes a one-size-fits-all, broad-brush approach." In 2026 she presided over San Marcos's implementation of SB 79 with exemptions for high-fire-risk and industrial parcels. San Marcos adopted no tenant protections in her eight years as mayor. No position on county tenant protections or the housing propositions.
“Supply matters.”
Not found. No statement on CalFresh or food funding. On new county taxes she has said "absolutely no," and "we have a spending problem," though that was said about Board proposals; she has not addressed the citizens' half-cent measure, which includes a 7% allocation for CalFresh and nutrition. She did vote in 2024 to place San Marcos's own Measure Q sales tax before voters.
Documented on resources, not found on accountability. Touts opening a Sheriff's substation and prioritizes "strong staffing for law enforcement." Voted for a 2024 resolution supporting Proposition 36 and for San Marcos's license-plate-reader program, which adopted the Sheriff's data policies rather than the city's own. Nothing on CLERB, jail deaths, stop data, or surveillance policy.
Not found. No statement on any LGBTQ+ question. The closest record is an October 2022 vote to table a council resolution supporting Prop 1 (reproductive freedom), which she called divisive and outside the council's authority.
Cited the county's Immigrant Legal Defense Fund, which provides free legal representation to people in immigration detention, as an example of misplaced county priorities. San Marcos never put an immigration item on a council agenda during her tenure. Opposes the county charter measure over its term-limit change.
“I think the priorities are all wrong right now at the county. We have real problems and real needs for people who have been here their entire lives.”
Asked for the one policy he would push to make housing more affordable for renters, he would update County regulations to allow more "missing middle" housing — townhouses, duplexes, and ADUs — in exclusionarily zoned areas, and provide free pre-approved development plans for those units. He also says the County needs to do much more of its part in building subsidized housing. His platform supports "smart growth and faster approvals," building near jobs and transit, and cutting "redundant reviews." Does not support a real-estate transfer tax, saying it would make it harder to increase "the volume and velocity of housing sales." No position on the housing propositions.
“The County also needs to do much more of its part in building subsidized housing!”
Asked what role the county should play in supporting community food pantries, he names the federal cuts to food assistance under HR 1 as his primary concern, notes that the County is the government responsible for SNAP, and says reducing the harm from those cuts is one of his core reasons for running. He wants the large nonprofits that do most of the county's food distribution focused on North County's areas of highest food insecurity, partnering closely with smaller organizations already doing the work there. His platform lists "protecting critical services from federal cuts" as a top priority. On Measure B, the citizens' half-cent sales tax, which includes a 7% allocation for CalFresh and nutrition, he said in April, "I will leave that to the voters to decide." In October he warned that if it fails, the county will have to make cuts and "people are going to die on our streets," and said he would support adding a sunset clause and an oversight system to monitor spending.
“one of my core reasons for running for this office is to reduce the harms being caused by these cuts.”
Supports publicly reporting police stop and use-of-force data, and independent review of misconduct complaints. Asked whether he supports both, he answered "Yes." His platform pledges to fully fund the Sheriff's Department, and he backs expanded mental-health crisis teams, jail diversion programs, and gun-violence restraining orders. His platform also lists "criminal justice reform."
Asked for one thing he would do to make LGBTQIA+ residents feel safe and welcome, he would invest County resources in local organizations providing inclusive services, like the North County LGBTQ Center. Endorsed by San Diego Democrats for Equality.
“Invest County resources in local organizations that are providing inclusive services to the community, like the North County LGBTQ Center.”
Opposes sharing local data, such as license-plate reader records, with federal immigration enforcement. Asked whether that data should be shared, he answered "No!" He condemns ICE operations in the county and praises the county's legal defense program: "I think it's great the county is fighting that." Finds the county charter measure's reforms reasonable and is "specifically enthusiastic" about its Ethics Commission, while saying he does not necessarily agree with changing term limits.
Oceanside City Council · District 1#
Answered our questionnaire. Supports tenant protections and stabilization policies in general, so that "our whole community (tenants and landlords)" can thrive. Asked whether he would reintroduce Chapter 14D, the tenant-protection ordinance that failed in September 2025, he commits to continuing the fight for renter rights "in the most effective way I can." He did not answer our question on just-cause protection at six months, relocation assistance, landlord eviction reporting, or rent stabilization individually. On the council he has the strongest tenant record: he voted for the just-cause ordinance on both readings, for rent stabilization, and for the legal-defense pilot. Voted for the Navigation Center rebid. No position on the housing propositions.
“The city should protect families from exploitation in the housing market through tenant protections and stabilization policies.”
Answered our questionnaire. Says the city should play an active role as "the hub of community resources" and commits to redefining its Neighborhood Services Department in that role. The city should also be "a loud advocate for reasonable laws that do not unduly burden aid providers in our communities." He did not answer our question on making it safe for eligible residents to use CalFresh, or on city funding for food access.
“I commit to redefining our Neighborhood Services Department in this role.”
Answered our questionnaire. Asked whether he would commit to directing OPD to publish annual stop and use-of-force data; a surveillance technology ordinance with council approval, published use policies, and annual audits; a written bar on federal data sharing; and independent investigative authority for the oversight committee, he answered all four parts with one word: "Yes." On surveillance, he wants disclosure, transparency, and public conversation about any action that reduces residents' privacy. He voted for the 2025 drone pilot with a stated reservation. He takes no position on Measure S.
“I feel strongly about disclosure and transparency around any and all actions which reduce the privacy of our residents.”
Answered our questionnaire. Says the city "should stand proudly with our LGBTQ+ community" at a time when progress on equity is being attacked, and that beyond visibility, more places for community members to voice their experience would show the city what actions are needed. He did not answer our question on adopting a flag policy that includes the Pride flag. On the council he voted to fly the Pride flag both times and authored the 2023 flag-policy proposal that would have expressly included it.
“The city should stand proudly with our LGBTQ+ community especially now when we are seeing much of the progress in equity be attacked and lost.”
Answered our questionnaire. Says his office has led the city's response to the crisis facing immigrant neighbors, joining public and less public actions in support of mutual aid and community response, and that the city should at minimum pass a declarative resolution of values affirming every person's right to human rights and due process. He did not answer our question on funding crisis support going forward, or on keeping license-plate-reader and camera data from federal immigration agencies; his "Yes" on police accountability includes a written bar on federal data sharing. On the council he made the motions on every September 2025 immigration item and voted for the crisis-relief funding and the Community Trust Resolution, both of which failed.
“We should, at the very least, pass a declarative resolution of values, especially declaring every human's right to human rights and due process.”
Not found. No campaign website, social media, statements, or press interviews were located. Voice of San Diego describes him as a community organizer. This entry will be updated if he responds to the questionnaire.
Not found. No campaign website, social media, statements, or press interviews were located.
Not found. No campaign website, social media, statements, or press interviews were located.
Not found. No campaign website, social media, statements, or press interviews were located.
Not found. No campaign website, social media, statements, or press interviews were located.
Oceanside City Council · District 2#
Voted against the tenant-protection package in April 2025, for it on first reading in September after his amendments were added, then against it on second reading, defeating it: "I felt I did the wrong thing because I don't believe what we did gets to the crux of these major things people are talking about." Voted against rent stabilization and the legal-defense pilot. Supports upholding Oceanside's existing mobile-home rent control. Voted against rebidding the Navigation Center: "It's a regional problem." His campaign priorities are city finances, agrotourism, and beach sand replenishment; his site does not mention tenants or homelessness.
“To me, you're just picking somebody's pocket.”
Not found. No stated position on CalFresh enrollment, food-access funding, or the food-security allocation in the countywide sales tax measure.
Documented on resources, not found on accountability. Supported the drone pilot. Endorsed by the police officers' association (indirect). Nothing on oversight, stop data, or surveillance policy.
“I think it's a great program.”
Voted against flying the Pride flag both times. Co-authored the 2023 proposal to limit city flagpoles to the U.S., California, and Oceanside flags.
“not to show favoritism or disdain for any group.”
Documented by vote. Voted for the six no-cost directives and the letter; voted against crisis-relief funding and against the Community Trust Resolution. Has not publicly explained either no vote.
Documented as framing. Campaigns on "housing options that fit a variety of budgets," protecting existing affordable housing, and "holding developers accountable." No stated position on just-cause, relocation assistance, or rent stabilization.
“An independent leader who listens to YOU, not to the big money developers.”
Not found. No stated position on CalFresh enrollment, food-access funding, or the food-security allocation in the countywide sales tax measure.
Not found. Frames safety as "investing in local resources that keep our neighborhoods safe, healthy, and thriving," without a policing policy.
Not found. General inclusion language only.
“everyone deserves care and safety here.”
Not found beyond that same general inclusion line.
Answered our questionnaire. Would vote for just-cause eviction protection after six months, relocation assistance for qualifying no-fault evictions, and landlord eviction reporting, and supports rent stabilization with a qualifier: a measured approach that allows reasonable adjustments for legitimate costs. Wants the city to use underused city land or buy commercial property to build and keep affordable housing as a public asset. He and fellow D2 challenger Ricky James are the only candidates in the four cities to commit to a specific tenant protection; they split on rent stabilization, which James opposes.
“a measured approach to rent stabilization that protects tenants from extreme rent increases while allowing reasonable adjustments for legitimate operating, maintenance, and capital costs.”
Answered our questionnaire. Commits to "make food security a recurring priority in the annual city budget," and at a minimum to city space and direct funding for local organizations already doing the work. Proposes a community food hub where farms, grocery stores, and restaurants donate safe, unsold food, and investment in local farms in Morro Hills. He is the only local candidate in the four cities to commit to city funding for food access.
“I believe food security should be an essential social service and a city responsibility.”
Answered our questionnaire. Supports requiring the Oceanside Police Department to publish annual stop and use-of-force data; a surveillance technology ordinance requiring council approval, public use policies, and annual audits; transparency on data shared with federal agencies; and independent investigative authority for civilian oversight, with no conditions attached. Would "vote to eliminate Flock systems" (license-plate-reader cameras), shift 10% of the police budget to firefighters and EMTs, and fund mental-health clinicians to respond alongside officers. Opposes Measure S.
Answered our questionnaire. Says he would have voted to fly the Pride flag in 2025 and supports a city flag policy that allows it to always fly. Also proposes a flag recognizing Oceanside's immigrant community.
“I would have voted to fly the Pride flag and will support a clear city flag policy that allows it to always fly.”
Answered our questionnaire. Would fund community-based crisis support for immigrant families affected by enforcement "and make that support a recurring part of the city budget," and says he would have voted yes on the crisis-relief funding the council rejected in September 2025. Supports protections preventing city-owned Flock cameras, license-plate readers, and camera-network data from being shared with federal immigration agencies, and removing the Flock cameras. Proposes multilingual Know Your Rights information in every city building, rapid-response networks, an emergency family-support fund, community navigators, and an "Oceanside Family Protection Network" of nonprofits, faith groups, schools, businesses, legal providers, and immigrant leaders.
“Local police should focus on protecting the community—not acting as federal immigration agents.”
Answered our questionnaire. Commits to three of the four tenant mechanisms Oceanside has rejected — just-cause eviction protection at six months, relocation assistance for no-fault evictions, and landlord eviction reporting — and declines the fourth, rent stabilization, framing the council's job as enforcing fair rules rather than setting prices. He and fellow D2 challenger Oscarin Ortega are the only candidates in the four cities to commit to any of the three. His campaign site separately covers homelessness along the San Luis Rey River Trail and opposition to sprawl.
“Yes, I'd vote for just-cause eviction protection at six months and relocation assistance for no-fault evictions, basic fairness. Yes on landlord eviction reporting too. I don't support rent stabilization.”
Answered our questionnaire. Says running food programs is not the core job of city government and does not commit new city funding for food access. Commits instead to saying publicly that no city department tracks or shares benefit use and that no Oceanside officer has any role in CalFresh eligibility, and is open to making it easier for groups like Oceanside Sanctuary to operate — space, less red tape. The commitment is one of non-interference rather than provision, and it is the only city-level answer in the four cities aimed at the fear-driven disenrollment the question was about.
“a councilmember can make sure the city is never the reason someone's afraid to use help they're legally entitled to.”
Answered our questionnaire, and is one of two candidates in the field, both Oceanside D2 challengers, with a surveillance-ordinance position. Supports OPD publishing annual stop and use-of-force data, and a surveillance technology ordinance — council approval, published use policies, annual audits — applied to the license plate readers and private camera network already in service, not only to new tools. Conditional on independent investigative authority for the oversight committee: he wants the difference between full record access and a parallel investigation settled before committing. Declines a written bar on sharing data with federal agencies, preferring one general standard limiting misuse of resident data. Opposes Measure S.
“Yes, I support a surveillance technology ordinance: council approval, published use policies, annual audits, applied to what's already in service (license plate readers, the camera network), not just new tools.”
Answered our questionnaire. He says a council's role goes beyond following state law, describing it as treating every group in the district the same way, and he supports adopting the written flag policy Oceanside has failed three times to produce. He would treat a park event permit and a Pride Month proclamation differently from the flagpoles themselves, with the same access any other group gets.
“I would not have voted to raise the flag, and that hasn't changed. I support adopting a written flag policy so this stops being relitigated every year.”
Answered our questionnaire. Says a city owes every resident the same services, safety response and due process regardless of status. Declines to say how he would have voted on the Community Trust Resolution or the crisis-relief funding, noting he was not seated and has not seen the language, and does not commit new dedicated city funding for crisis support going forward. On the license-plate-reader and camera data he gives the same answer he gave on policing: a general privacy and use policy limiting misuse of resident data, not a commitment written around one specific agency.
“A city owes every resident the same services, safety response, and due process, regardless of status.”
Not found. No campaign website, social media, or press coverage located. We have sent him the questionnaire.
Not found. No campaign website, social media, or press coverage located.
Not found. No campaign website, social media, or press coverage located.
Not found. No campaign website, social media, or press coverage located.
Not found. No campaign website, social media, or press coverage located.
Oceanside Unified · Trustee Area 1#
Answered our questionnaire. Drawing on her work as a school counselor, the one change she names is continuing the district's mental health support from counselors and social workers and expanding it "where we can, as fiscally possible." She says the social work team serves Tier 3 students with the highest needs, including students with attendance concerns, and that the district will keep funding it "provided funding sources are available, while ensuring we maintain a positive budget." She cast the lone no vote against closing Reynolds Elementary in March 2023; asked about it, she called it "the most heartbreaking board meeting" and a very difficult vote, made on safety concerns after the board had anticipated a renovation.
“We will continue to fund our social worker program provided funding sources are available, while ensuring we maintain a positive budget.”
Answered our questionnaire. Says three of the district's community schools are designated food distribution sites, and that OUSD works with community partners, food bank providers, and the City of Oceanside to connect campuses to local food distribution and choose locations that best serve families. She did not answer our question on adding school pantries. She signed a March 2025 letter urging Rep. Darrell Issa to oppose federal cuts to SNAP, as did all five OUSD trustees.
“Through our community schools partnerships, we continue to expand opportunities.”
Answered our questionnaire. Says writing restorative practices and Alternative-to-Suspension programs into board policy "is something to consider," and that for now, being able to change and modify the programs as needs arise lets the district make improvements and adjust to its student population.
“Writing board policy regarding restorative practices and Alternative-to-Suspension programs is something to consider.”
Answered our questionnaire. Says OUSD follows current law and the Education Code on supporting LGBTQ+ students, that LGBTQ+ students disproportionately experience harassment and bullying, and that the district is committed to a safe, supportive, and inclusive learning environment with equal access for every student. She did not answer yes or no on whether OUSD should continue to have no parental-notification policy.
“LGBTQ+ students disproportionately experience harassment and bullying and it is important to ensure students have access to a safe learning environment.”
Answered our questionnaire. Supports Board Policy 1445, which sets guidelines to keep schools safe and welcoming for all students regardless of citizenship or immigration status, and voted to approve it. On the April 2026 move of North Terrace middle schoolers onto Camp Pendleton, she says families who were affected or had concerns about their child's placement were offered a guaranteed intradistrict transfer on request. She signed the March 2025 letter opposing "an unaccountable immigration and border enforcement regime," as did all five trustees.
“Our students deserve to know that they belong and are welcome on our campus and that measures are in place to protect them.”
Answered part of our questionnaire. Says he deeply values the district's social workers and support teams in keeping vulnerable students engaged, and that as one-time federal and state funding expires, the board's priority must be "identifying sustainable budget reallocations and expanding community partnerships." He did not answer our questions on the one change he would make, keeping seven social workers, or the district's 286 unstably housed students.
“I deeply value the role of our school social workers and support teams in keeping vulnerable students engaged.”
Answered part of our questionnaire. Supports expanding community partnerships, "such as expanding school pantries with Feeding San Diego," so that no child goes hungry. He did not answer our question on Libby Elementary's pantry.
“to ensure no child goes hungry or falls through the cracks.”
Answered part of our questionnaire. His priority is protecting instructional time. He wants teachers empowered to maintain orderly classrooms with "clear, predictable consequences," and says that when one student repeatedly disrupts a class, it takes away from the other 29 who are there to learn. He cites figures of 70% of students struggling in math and 60% in reading and writing, and opposes policies that create heavy administrative burdens or disrupt learning. He did not answer our question on writing restorative practices and Alternative-to-Suspension into board policy, or our follow-up on whether he would want less restorative practice.
“I believe we must empower our teachers with the authority to maintain orderly classrooms and ensure that actions have clear, predictable consequences.”
Answered part of our questionnaire. On inclusion and campus safety, commits to every school being "an orderly and welcoming environment where all students can focus on achieving their academic potential," and supports "clear, lawful, and stable district policies that protect our families." He did not answer yes or no on whether OUSD should continue to have no parental-notification policy.
“I am fully committed to ensuring that every school in our district is an orderly and welcoming environment where all students can focus on achieving their academic potential.”
Not found. He did not answer our questions on Board Policy 1445 or the North Terrace relocation, and has no public statement on ICE, immigration enforcement, or immigrant families.
Oceanside Unified · Trustee Area 3#
Supports retaining the seven-person social work team, and wants district leadership to evaluate eligible recurring state funding, including through the district's Local Control and Accountability Plan, alongside the relative impact of other spending, with outside funding as a supplement. For students without stable housing, Joey prioritizes reliable transportation, school continuity, timely enrollment, meals, counseling, and connections to family resources. The first-year change Pearson names is a shared public dashboard of the district's priorities and its measures of learning, attendance, and student well-being, with an initial public version in year one.
“I approach attendance as a student-support and access issue, recognizing the effects of housing instability, transportation, mental health, and whether students feel safe and connected at school.”
Supports expanding pantries where there is unmet need and a sustainable plan, including at additional community schools. For Libby, says sustainability planning should begin before the outside funding ends, with the district and partners reviewing demand, costs, staffing, and renewal or replacement funding, then building a model that can expand where needed. Plans to learn from a UCLA colleague's community-schools work at the Riverside County Office of Education and from Oceanside Sanctuary's food pantry and its work with Feeding San Diego, and to explore voluntary food drives, while saying dependable access requires a reliable supply and ongoing support. Wants to measure households served, consistency of distribution, and family feedback.
“No student should have to learn while hungry; in fact, learning is largely unavailable to students who do not have their basic biological needs met.”
Supports restorative practices and the Alternative-to-Suspension program, and says the board should set clear expectations for accountability, safety, and restorative discipline through policy. Says suspension calls for discretion, with less exclusionary interventions used when they can address behavior while maintaining safety, and expulsion reserved for serious circumstances permitted or required by law, with due process. Also says teachers and students deserve safe classrooms, which takes administrative backing, family communication, and effective responses to repeated disruption or threats. For students with disabilities, multilingual learners, and other underserved students, wants to examine repeat incidents, lost instructional time, safety, and successful reentry across schools and student groups.
“I support restorative practices and Alternatives to Suspension, and I do not believe sending children home should be the routine answer to misconduct.”
Does not support a parental-notification policy, the kind of rule some districts have adopted requiring staff to tell parents when a student asks to use a different name, pronouns, or gender identity at school. Wants the district to keep its current approach of having none, beyond what the law requires. Speaks as a member of the LGBTQIA+ community. Calls parents and guardians essential partners, and expects district counsel to turn legal requirements into clear procedures so individual educators are not left to navigate them. If existing requirements put students at risk, is prepared to take a principled public stand, including advocacy and appropriate legal challenges.
“Every student deserves to feel safe, respected, and included at school, including students who are part of the LGBTQIA+ community.”
Supports the core safeguards of Board Policy 1445, the district's immigration-enforcement policy, adopted unanimously in March 2026 to comply with a new state law (AB 495). It bars immigration agents from school buses and nonpublic areas of campus without a judicial warrant, bars staff from collecting immigration status, and requires staff not to obstruct an agent who enters anyway. Plans to review the full adopted policy before endorsing every provision. Supports keeping teachers and other employees out of physical confrontations with federal agents, paired with refusing consent to unauthorized access and documenting and escalating incidents.
“Schools should be safe, welcoming places where immigrant families can participate in their children's education.”
Names chronic absenteeism as a problem, framed around accountability and readiness, and proposes no remedy. Says some students, including those with individualized education plans, "are not receiving the consistent support they need." Nothing on counselors, social workers, home visits, or homeless students.
“chronic absenteeism continues to impact classrooms, and graduation rates do not reflect the level of readiness our students deserve”
Not found. No mention of school meals, hunger, or pantries.
Not found. Her platform calls for "safe classrooms" without tying it to discipline policy, suspension rates, or police on campus.
She has published no position on LGBTQ+ students or parental notification. Her campaign's published endorsement list is headed by Sonja Shaw, the Chino Valley board president who wrote California's best-known parental-notification policy, and includes two officers of Turning Point Education. These are endorsements, not her positions.
She has published no position on immigration or ICE. Her endorsers include Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco and Agnes Gibboney, both identified with immigration-enforcement advocacy. These are endorsements, not her positions.
Oceanside Unified · Trustee Area 4#
The only evidence she has engaged attendance at board level: as vice president in March 2022, facing $8 million in projected cuts tied partly to low attendance, she requested a workshop on a recovery plan. The frame was fiscal. No record of her position on protecting student-support staff. As board president she voted to close Reynolds Elementary in March 2023, relocating 566 students, citing building safety.
“I don't want to worry that a student would get hurt because they fell into a hole ... or the building shifts just enough, and they trip and hit their head or something.”
No statement on school meals, pantries, or CalFresh. She signed the March 2025 letter opposing federal SNAP and Medicaid cuts, as did all five OUSD trustees.
Not found. OUSD's restorative approach cut suspensions sharply at Oceanside High, but every quote in that coverage is from staff. No trustee has taken a position on making it board policy.
No statement in her own words. She sat on the board that adopted a 2021 resolution recognizing Pride Month and that earned Equality California's top rating for LGBTQ-supportive districts in 2022.
Nothing in her own words on ICE or immigrant families. She signed the March 2025 letter opposing mass deportation, as did all five trustees. In April 2026 the board moved about 195 North Terrace middle schoolers onto Camp Pendleton for three years; community members objected that undocumented parents cannot enter the base. Individual votes are not public.
Not found. No campaign website, social media, candidate questionnaire, forum appearance, or press interview was located. He filed a candidate statement that will appear in the county voter pamphlet.
Not found. No campaign website, social media, candidate questionnaire, forum appearance, or press interview was located.
Not found. No campaign website, social media, candidate questionnaire, forum appearance, or press interview was located.
Not found. No campaign website, social media, candidate questionnaire, forum appearance, or press interview was located.
Not found. No campaign website, social media, candidate questionnaire, forum appearance, or press interview was located.
Made the 2022 motion to reinstate inclusionary housing. Campaigns on "balanced development that creates workforce housing while preserving open space." Was on the council for the 4–0 encampment-ban vote and has not publicly explained his vote. Nothing on tenant protections.
“If you come into my city, then we're going to have you do the density bonus to provide inclusionary housing.”
Not found. No stated position on CalFresh enrollment, food-access funding, or the food-security allocation in the countywide sales tax measure.
Documented on resources, not found on accountability. Proposes more patrols, "technology like body cameras and crime analytics," and a Mayor's Public Safety Advisory Council focused on mental health and youth programs, not investigative oversight. Endorsed by the Sheriff's Association (indirect).
“Public safety is my number one priority.”
Indirect. Was on the council for the unanimous 2022 Pride flag vote. No statement in his own words.
Documented in 2018 only. At a 2018 mayoral forum he opposed Vista joining a lawsuit against California's sanctuary law. He left the council before the November 2025 resolution and has taken no position on it.
“I feel the California Values Act could just as easily be called the Vista Values Act... It's not about being a Republican or Democrat, it's about being a Vistan.”
The most detailed platform in Vista: expand permanent supportive, interim, and sober housing; ban private-equity purchases of single-family homes; prioritize workforce housing with union labor. He names no specific tenant-protection mechanism. He has not stated a position on the 2024 encampment ban despite his commission seat.
“strengthening renter protections, holding bad landlords who violate the law accountable”
Not found. No stated position on CalFresh enrollment, food-access funding, or the food-security allocation in the countywide sales tax measure.
Documented on approach, not found on mechanisms. Favors "noncarceral approaches to crime prevention," youth and anti-violence programs, and reentry services. Says he has "pushed back against surveillance technologies that threaten residents' privacy."
The only candidate in the four cities with an affirmative LGBTQ+ platform.
“expanding and protecting gender-affirming care, making Vista an LGBTQ+ sanctuary city, and hiring new city staffers dedicated to uplifting our LGBTQ+ residents.”
Pledges to keep ICE out of public facilities without a warrant and to ensure "the sheriff's department does not collaborate with ICE." He has not explained how a city that contracts with the Sheriff would enforce the second commitment.
“No one in Vista should live in fear of going to work, dropping their kids off at school, or calling the sheriff for help.”
Vista City Council · District 1#
Documented in part. Voted to reinstate inclusionary housing. Abstained on the 2024 encampment ban, warning the definition could sweep in napping or picnicking and that citations would damage people's job and housing prospects. In eight years on the council she has not introduced a tenant-protection ordinance.
“affordable housing for seniors and locals, rental assistance, tenant protections”
Not found. No stated position on CalFresh enrollment, food-access funding, or the food-security allocation in the countywide sales tax measure.
The strongest record in Vista. Led the 2025 rejection of license plate readers, pressing on "the strength of safeguards to prevent illegal data sharing with federal agencies." Has not proposed codifying the ALPR rejection as an ordinance.
“The only way I'd ever get there is through many, many community workshops where we are ensuring folks that their rights are preserved.”
Documented by role. Openly LGBTQIA+; Resource Center board member; on the council for the unanimous Pride flag votes. Has not authored a municipal nondiscrimination or gender-affirming-care measure.
Authored and voted for the November 2025 due-process resolution. Signed the February 2026 letter urging Escondido to cancel its ICE firing-range agreements. Has not publicly addressed federal immigration access to SANDAG's ARJIS law-enforcement database, which her board oversees.
“I believe that it's the duty of the City Council... to ensure that people's rights are protected.”
Documented on homeownership and homelessness. On homelessness: "get our unhoused neighbors indoors quickly and connect them with stable housing and the support they need." Nothing on renters. No position on the encampment ban.
“I will support responsible development that creates more housing opportunities, so more families can achieve the dream of homeownership.”
Not found. No stated position on CalFresh enrollment, food-access funding, or the food-security allocation in the countywide sales tax measure.
Documented on resources. Nothing on accountability.
“I will ensure Vista's firefighters and law-enforcement officers have the resources, training, and competitive pay they deserve.”
Not found. No statement on any LGBTQ+ question was located.
Not found. No statement on the November 2025 resolution or immigration enforcement. His two lead endorsers cast the votes against that resolution. His platform includes "opposing unnecessary tax and fee increases" without naming any measure on the ballot.
Not found. Her stated focus is resident communication, underserved communities, traffic, and "enforcement of city rules for neighborhood safety."
Not found. No stated position on CalFresh enrollment, food-access funding, or the food-security allocation in the countywide sales tax measure.
Not found. No statement on policing was located.
Not found. No statement on any LGBTQ+ question was located.
Indirect. Her biography states she has "advocated for immigrant justice"; no specifics and no position on the November 2025 resolution.
Vista City Council · District 4#
Documented in part. Credits himself with securing $5 million in state funding for the Buena Creek Navigation Center and with "implementing affordable housing policies." Voted for the 2024 encampment ban (the vote was 4–0 with one abstention). Nothing on renters.
Not found. No stated position on CalFresh enrollment, food-access funding, or the food-security allocation in the countywide sales tax measure.
Documented on resources. Voted for additional deputies and EMTs. Was on the council for the 2025 ALPR rejection but is not quoted on it.
Not found. On the council for the 2024 Pride flag vote; not individually quoted.
Documented by vote. Supplied the third vote that passed the November 2025 due-process resolution, 3–2. He has not been quoted on why.
Supports building "truly affordable homes" near the Sprinter corridor with nonprofit developers, security-deposit assistance, expanded Housing Choice vouchers, and down-payment support. His renter proposals are subsidies rather than protections; nothing on just-cause or rent stabilization.
Not found. No stated position on CalFresh enrollment, food-access funding, or the food-security allocation in the countywide sales tax measure.
The most explicit anti-surveillance commitment by any candidate in the four cities, from someone who works in the industry that sells such systems. He also supports increasing Sheriff, fire, and EMT staffing. Nothing on oversight.
“Mass video surveillance technology has no place in Vista. I'll fight to ensure this never happens.”
Not found. No statement on any LGBTQ+ question was located.
Not found. No statement on the November 2025 resolution.
Vista Unified · Trustee Area 3#
In 2022 she named student mental health her top priority, took credit for opening five community schools with wraparound services, pledged to open three more, and committed to asking the district for more social workers. Two community schools, Beaumont and Rancho Minerva, were later closed in the 2023 consolidation; her individual vote on that timeline is not recorded. Her 2026 campaign site does not mention social workers, attendance, or homeless students.
“I'll continue to request that VUSD hire more social workers to help our other schools as well.”
Not found. No statement on free meals, summer meal sites, pantries, CalFresh, or the 2025 SNAP disruption.
Not found. No statement on PBIS, restorative practices, or suspension. She was on the board when it cut school resource officers in 2019 and restored them in 2022, but no source records her individual votes.
Not found. No statement on LGBTQ+ student protections, transgender students, parental notification, Pride, or book challenges.
No policy record: nothing on ICE campus access or know-your-rights. She held her seat for the district's 2020 border resolution, but the roll call could not be retrieved. She has spoken publicly against anti-Latino conduct, after a parent mocked her surname at a 2021 board meeting, and expanding dual-language immersion is a named priority on her 2026 site.
“It's 2021 and we are in a middle of a social justice movement and we have community members who think it's funny to make fun of Latinos and their names and my commitment [is] to all kids in this community.”
Not found. A website that appears to be his campaign page says he is running to ensure "every student has a safe, supportive environment" and names digital citizenship and parent involvement as priorities, but addresses none of the five. No official source links that site to his candidacy. No endorsements, forum appearances, or press coverage were located.
Not found. No statement located on this priority.
Not found. No statement located on this priority.
Not found. No statement located on this priority.
Not found. No statement located on this priority.
Voted for San Marcos's SB 79 ordinance exempting high-fire-severity parcels. Emphasizes local control over "how we build, how much we build and where we build." Claims credit for "prohibiting camping in our parks, on sidewalks, and near schools" and seconded the 2025 expansion. Nothing on tenant protections or the Affirmed Housing project.
“The City Council thought it was a wise approach to try and maintain some local control.”
Not found. No stated position on CalFresh enrollment, food-access funding, or the food-security allocation in the countywide sales tax measure.
Documented on resources, not found on accountability. Lists license plate readers and a new Sheriff's office in San Elijo Hills among his accomplishments; commits to keeping law enforcement "adequately resourced." Endorsed by the deputies' union (indirect). Nothing on oversight, stop data, or surveillance policy.
Not found. Joined the council after the 2022 Prop 1 vote; no LGBTQ+ matter has come before the council since.
Not found. San Marcos has never put immigration on a council agenda.
In December 2021 voted to endorse the "Our Neighborhood Voices" initiative to let local zoning override state housing law. Was on the council for the 2024 encampment ban, reported as 4–1 with Nuñez the only no. Twelve years on the council with no tenant-protection ordinance adopted; no position on SB 79 or Affirmed Housing.
“Invest in our neighborhoods, maintain our roads and infrastructure, and be a careful steward of every taxpayer dollar.”
Not found. No stated position on CalFresh enrollment, food-access funding, or the food-security allocation in the countywide sales tax measure.
Documented on resources. Led the successful Yes on Measure Q sales-tax campaign. Was on the council for the Sheriff contract and the ALPR approval. Nothing on accountability.
“our firefighters, sheriffs, and emergency services have the resources needed”
Not found directly. Her school board tenure ended in 2012, before the district's transgender-student policy controversies. On the council, she voted in 2022 to table the Prop 1 resolution, saying the issue "should be left to voters to decide."
Not found. San Marcos has never put immigration on a council agenda.
San Marcos City Council · District 1#
The strongest record in San Marcos. Voted against the 2021 "Our Neighborhood Voices" resolution. Sole no on the 2024 encampment ban. Her candidate statement cites "the challenges of affordable housing and food insecurity" and says she has "championed housing accessibility." Eight years in office with no tenant-protection ordinance introduced.
“Making the possibility of criminalizing these individuals and families, I don't think will help their situation.”
Documented in part. The only San Marcos candidate, and one of two in all four cities, to name food insecurity in a filed statement. No specific proposal.
“the challenges of affordable housing and food insecurity”
Documented as a pattern of dissent. Voted no on the 2024 Prop 36 resolution. Voted for the unanimous ALPR program. Voted against a 2022 street-vendor restriction in her district. Nothing on oversight or surveillance policy.
“I don't have the confidence that this is the right solution.”
Indirect. Voted against tabling the 2022 Prop 1 resolution. No LGBTQ+-specific statement.
“This is an issue that directly impacts our residents — this is a health and safety issue.”
Documented in part. The only San Marcos candidate with any statement, on community response to ICE activity. She has not proposed a council policy.
“We rely on the community. People are on high alert. If they see anything, hear anything, if ICE is in the area, they'll let us know.”
Not found. No website, endorsements, press coverage, or filed candidate statement. This entry will be updated if he responds to the questionnaire.
Not found. No website, endorsements, press coverage, or filed candidate statement.
Not found. No website, endorsements, press coverage, or filed candidate statement.
Not found. No website, endorsements, press coverage, or filed candidate statement.
Not found. No website, endorsements, press coverage, or filed candidate statement.
San Marcos City Council · District 2#
Documented, thin. Priorities are updating the General Plan, wise Measure Q spending, and youth advocacy. No position on affordable housing, Affirmed Housing, tenants, or encampments.
Not found. No stated position on CalFresh enrollment, food-access funding, or the food-security allocation in the countywide sales tax measure.
Indirect. Career public-safety background; no stated position on the Sheriff contract, oversight, or surveillance.
Not found. No statement on any LGBTQ+ question was located.
Not found. No statement on immigration was located.
Documented, general. Favors local development control and "diverse housing options that support our workforce." No position on Affirmed Housing, tenants, SB 79, or encampments.
“I am pro-smart growth... housing and small business growth that complements what our community needs”
Not found. No stated position on CalFresh enrollment, food-access funding, or the food-security allocation in the countywide sales tax measure.
Documented on resources. Favors "smart, proactive approaches that keep neighborhoods safe" and first-responder resources. Endorsed by the deputies' union (indirect). Nothing on accountability.
Not found. No statement on any LGBTQ+ question was located.
Not found. No statement on immigration was located.
San Marcos Unified · Trustee Area E#
Acknowledges the budget pressure behind the district's February 2026 layoff list without saying what she would cut. She has not committed to protecting social workers, counselors, or any student-support position.
“There are hard decisions in our future due to budget realities. I believe in listening to our community, working with educators, and making thoughtful, balanced decisions that put students first.”
Not found. Her platform does not mention meals, pantries, CalFresh, or hunger.
Not found. Her platform calls for safe schools and mental health support, but never mentions PBIS, restorative practices, discipline, or suspension.
Uses inclusive language (every student should feel safe "no exceptions") but never mentions LGBTQ+ students, Resolution 38, parental notification, or gender identity. Her platform also calls for "transparency" and giving parents "a voice" in decisions affecting their children, and says schools "should focus on students, not politics." Neither line is a position on Resolution 38, the question this seat decides.
“every student deserves to feel safe, respected, and supported - no exceptions”
Not found. Nothing on immigration, ICE, Resolution 39, English learners, or campus access.
Not found. No campaign website, social media, candidate questionnaire, forum appearance, or press interview was located. He has not completed Ballotpedia's candidate survey.
Not found. No campaign website, social media, candidate questionnaire, forum appearance, or press interview was located. He has not completed Ballotpedia's candidate survey.
Not found. No campaign website, social media, candidate questionnaire, forum appearance, or press interview was located. He has not completed Ballotpedia's candidate survey.
Not found. No campaign website, social media, candidate questionnaire, forum appearance, or press interview was located. He has not completed Ballotpedia's candidate survey.
Not found. No campaign website, social media, candidate questionnaire, forum appearance, or press interview was located. He has not completed Ballotpedia's candidate survey.
Voted for Village Plaza while denouncing the state. On rezoning: "We're damned if we do, damned if we don't." In 2020 warned of "unintended consequences" of COVID rent deferments. Nothing on tenant protections.
“The state has come in and started bullying us. I think it's overreach.”
Not found. No stated position on CalFresh enrollment, food-access funding, or the food-security allocation in the countywide sales tax measure.
Supported creating the engagement commission. On COPPS: "an investment in the quality of life." Opposed defunding in 2020. Nothing on independent investigative authority, stop data, or surveillance policy.
“It is extremely important that every police department has accountability.”
Voted no on the Pride flag.
“I just can't say 'yes' to one group and then have to say 'no' to other groups.”
Documented in 2018. Put on the agenda and voted for Carlsbad's opposition to SB 54. No subsequent statement revising it.
Documented, general. Pillars are "Protecting Carlsbad's Character" (manage growth, preserve the Village) and "Business & Smart Growth" without "excessive regulation or overdevelopment." No housing, affordability, or homelessness page.
Not found. His Meals on Wheels volunteering is background, not a policy.
Documented, general. Nothing on accountability.
“Leverage first-responder experience to ensure adequate resources and preparedness.”
Not found. No statement on any LGBTQ+ question was located.
Not found. No statement on immigration was located.
Not found. His six stated priorities are city responsiveness, senior safety, public safety, infrastructure, technology, and quality of life; none states a housing position.
Not found. No stated position on CalFresh enrollment, food-access funding, or the food-security allocation in the countywide sales tax measure.
Not found. His public safety priority — "crime, homelessness, and community safety with practical action" — names no policing policy.
Not found. No statement on any LGBTQ+ question was located.
Not found. No statement on immigration was located.
Not found. No website, endorsements, or press coverage located. This entry will be updated if he responds to the questionnaire.
Not found. No website, endorsements, or press coverage located.
Not found. No website, endorsements, or press coverage located.
Not found. No website, endorsements, or press coverage located.
Not found. No website, endorsements, or press coverage located.
Carlsbad City Council · District 1#
Sole no on Village Plaza, citing impacts on local businesses and Village character; the project included 27 affordable units. Voted against placing the 2024 Prop H spending-threshold measure on the ballot. Has opposed raising taxes as disproportionately affecting "lower-income residents in the Village and Barrio." Nothing on tenant protections.
Not found. No stated position on CalFresh enrollment, food-access funding, or the food-security allocation in the countywide sales tax measure.
Documented as posture. From her 2020 Assembly campaign she supported a "tough love" approach with treatment services. Nothing on oversight, stop data, or surveillance.
“Homelessness is the biggest threat to public safety.”
Voted no on the Pride flag, calling the issue "not a unifying topic" and, twice, framing it as needing a neutral policy first. Carlsbad still has no flag policy.
“absent a flag policy, I certainly don't want to be the arbiter of free speech in Carlsbad, California.”
Not found. No statement on immigration was located.
Not found. No website, statements, or press coverage located. The party's endorsement process requires a completed candidate questionnaire, so positions exist on paper; this entry will be updated as they become available.
Not found. No website, statements, or press coverage located.
Not found. No website, statements, or press coverage located.
Not found. No website, statements, or press coverage located.
Not found. No website, statements, or press coverage located.
Carlsbad City Council · District 3#
Documented, and in tension. Voted for Village Plaza and for the rezoning ("We're trying to balance the community's comments and the state"), while her campaign site pledges to "protect Carlsbad from overdevelopment" and revisit the Growth Management Plan. Her priorities page does not mention affordable housing or homelessness. Nothing on tenant protections.
“If we all could do what she could, we would, but I think this project is going to be moving forward.”
Not found. No stated position on CalFresh enrollment, food-access funding, or the food-security allocation in the countywide sales tax measure.
Documented by vote. Voted to create the engagement commission and for the vehicle-camping ordinance. Spoke at a George Floyd vigil on "police brutality that affect[s] our country." Nothing on independent oversight authority or surveillance.
“a very comprehensive and balanced approach”
Voted to fly the Pride flag and prevailed. After the Resource Center rejected the proclamation: "I heard it loud and clear that they don't feel safe." No position on a formal flag policy.
“I would hope that we are seen as policymakers that actually do want to represent our entire community.”
Not found. Was not on the council in 2018. Has not addressed federal access to SANDAG's ARJIS database, on whose board she is an alternate.
Not found. No website, endorsements, or press coverage located. This entry will be updated if he responds to the questionnaire.
Not found. No website, endorsements, or press coverage located.
Not found. No website, endorsements, or press coverage located.
Not found. No website, endorsements, or press coverage located.
Not found. No website, endorsements, or press coverage located.
Carlsbad · City Treasurer#
Not found, and out of scope: the Treasurer does not vote on housing policy. Has updated the investment policy and created an Investment Review Board. Whether the city's roughly $900 million portfolio is screened on social criteria is the one open question in his lane.
“safety of principal, sufficient liquidity, and responsible yield.”
Not found, and out of scope: the Treasurer does not vote on food policy.
Not found, and out of scope: the Treasurer does not vote on policing policy.
Not found, and out of scope: the Treasurer does not vote on LGBTQIA+ policy.
Not found, and out of scope: the Treasurer does not vote on immigration policy.
Not found, and out of scope: the Treasurer does not vote on housing policy. Criticizes prior investment losses and pension underfunding.
“The job description of Carlsbad City Treasurer is almost entirely focused on the direct investment management of the city's $900 million reserve fund.”
Not found, and out of scope: the Treasurer does not vote on food policy.
Not found, and out of scope: the Treasurer does not vote on policing policy.
Not found, and out of scope: the Treasurer does not vote on LGBTQIA+ policy.
Not found, and out of scope: the Treasurer does not vote on immigration policy.
Carlsbad · City Clerk#
Out of scope: the Clerk runs elections and records and does not vote on housing policy.
Out of scope: the Clerk runs elections and records and does not vote on food policy.
Out of scope: the Clerk runs elections and records and does not vote on policing policy. One clerk-adjacent note: Carlsbad's public records portal is not usable without cookies and JavaScript, which makes council minutes hard for residents to reach.
Out of scope: the Clerk runs elections and records and does not vote on LGBTQIA+ policy.
Out of scope: the Clerk runs elections and records and does not vote on immigration policy.
Carlsbad Unified · Trustee Area 1#
Calls students without stable housing some of the most vulnerable children the district serves, and says that as a teacher, assistant principal, and principal she has seen how housing instability affects attendance, learning, and well-being. Wants CUSD to make sure these students' rights under the federal McKinney-Vento Act — immediate enrollment, transportation to school, and full access to programs — are honored in practice, with all staff well informed on the law, and wants schools and the district partnering with county and community agencies on housing, health, and basic needs.
“Our goal should be stability, continuity, and consistency at school, even when life at home is uncertain.”
Supports food pantries and expanded meal programs at district schools. Calls California's universal school meals program a huge change in how schools support students, and wants to build on it by extending food support to weekends and non-school hours and by partnering with local food banks and community organizations to offer pantries for families. Says these programs work best when they are dignified, easy to access, and free of stigma for students and families.
“I support building on [California's universal school meals program] by providing extended times… like on weekends or during non school hours”
Supports restorative practices as an alternative to suspension, drawing on her experience as a principal, and says school discipline has traditionally affected different student populations in different ways. Calls restorative approaches a way of learning from incidents rather than the absence of accountability, and says they require clear expectations, trained staff, consistent follow-through, and following the Education Code where a situation needs immediate disciplinary action. Pairs them with counseling and mental-health support as prevention, and wants the practices kept fair, consistent, and transparent so every campus stays safe for students and staff.
“restorative practices, when implemented well, help students take responsibility, repair harm, and stay connected to school, while suspensions often push struggling students further behind.”
Asked whether she supports AB 1955, the state law that bars schools from requiring staff to tell parents about a student's gender identity without the student's consent, she says she supports the LGBTQIA+ community and the current state laws that support it. Says every student deserves to feel safe and supported at school, and also believes strongly in family partnership: staff should help students with those conversations at home when they are ready, with counseling and resources available to families. On the board she has cast three consistent votes: against delaying the Pride flag decision in May 2023, for the Forward Together diversity, equity, inclusion and belonging plan in July 2023 (which she seconded), and for flying the Pride flag in May 2026.
“I support the LGBTQIA+ community and the current state laws that support this community.”
Says every child has a constitutional right to a free public education regardless of immigration status, and that schools must be places where students and families feel safe enough to show up every day. Wants every California district to follow state guidance on limiting immigration enforcement's access to campuses, protect student records, and make sure families know their rights in their home languages, with multilingual family outreach and partnerships with community organizations that can connect families to legal and other resources. On the board she voted for Board Policy 1445 on immigration enforcement at both readings.
“When families are afraid, attendance and learning suffer, and our job is to keep every child in the classroom and ensure that they are safe and feel safe.”
Not found. No campaign website, social media, candidate questionnaire, forum appearance, or press interview was located. No filed candidate statement was published.
Not found. No campaign website, social media, candidate questionnaire, forum appearance, or press interview was located. No filed candidate statement was published.
Not found. No campaign website, social media, candidate questionnaire, forum appearance, or press interview was located. No filed candidate statement was published.
Not found. No campaign website, social media, candidate questionnaire, forum appearance, or press interview was located. No filed candidate statement was published.
Not found. No campaign website, social media, candidate questionnaire, forum appearance, or press interview was located. No filed candidate statement was published.
Carlsbad Unified · Trustee Area 4#
Not found. Her only related line is a pledge to "continue focus on student wellness initiatives," without numbers or funding.
Her platform's only food language is "healthier school meals," fourth in a list about academic and career pathways. She has not said whether that means better food for students already eating or reaching students who are not, and has taken no board action on meals or the 2025 SNAP disruption.
“Our students deserve strong college preparation, expanded career and technical education, skilled trades pathways, and healthier school meals.”
Not found on PBIS, restorative practices, suspension data, or police on campus. Her campus-safety actions have been conduct rules: she originated the district's cell-phone ban.
The most extensive record of any school board candidate in this guide, all in one direction. She said at a 2022 forum she could not support LGBTQIA+ student health and well-being programs; cast the lone no vote against approving the Carlsbad High Equality Coalition Club in 2023; voted to delay the Pride flag in 2023; cast the lone no vote on the diversity, equity, inclusion and belonging plan; and cast the lone no vote on flying the Pride flag in May 2026. Her stated objection is consistently about which flags and groups the district recognizes: the same night she also voted against the Juneteenth and 250th-anniversary resolutions.
“If we fly the Pride flag, then we have to consider that we would have to fly any flag requested.”
Voted for Board Policy 1445 on immigration enforcement at both readings, and called it a starting point open to revision.
“people were concerned that certain language was not included within the policy, however, it is important to remember that the policy is a starting point and the Board should be open to revisions in the future.”
Not found. No statement on homeless students, attendance, or social workers.
Not found. No statement on school meals or pantries.
Her only safety language is about online harms and post-pandemic isolation. Nothing on PBIS, restorative practices, suspension disparities, or police on campus.
“Cyberbullying and online stalking are very real concerns for our families. Having safe schools is non-negotiable.”
Not found. No statement on the Pride flag, the diversity plan, or parental notification.
Not found. No statement on immigration or Board Policy 1445.
Carlsbad Unified · Trustee Area 5#
Supports a district social worker whose role reaches past attendance outreach to the whole family, ideally a joint position split-funded with the City of Carlsbad and Oceanside, and possibly more than one. Calls the one-year increase in socioeconomically disadvantaged students from 21% to 30%, "pretty significant" and says the district's main lever is partnering with the city and county. He also wants full-day kindergarten districtwide and an expanded transitional kindergarten program.
“If you can address the systemic issues… I think you're going to have a much better result.”
On federal food cuts, says schools should do as much as they can with their funding to feed students who have come to depend on school meals. Open to a school food pantry after a site-by-site needs study, and would rather combine resources with existing community pantries than duplicate them. Points to Calavera's weekend take-home fruit-and-vegetable program as a model.
“Schools should do as much as possible with their funding to provide food to their students… we have students that have come to depend on food at school.”
"Definitely in favor" of bringing in Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS), which the district lists as not started; he believes MTSS staff already do similar work on the academic side and that extending it to behavior would be "a pretty easy move" with training. Acknowledges a history of harsher discipline for students of color in Carlsbad, and would use the data to find whether it is concentrated among particular assistant principals — to train or, if need be, replace them — or whether early problems go unaddressed and escalate into suspensions. Read the district's suspension rates by race, he said they match his understanding and should be addressed.
“There's definitely been historically an issue with minority students receiving harsher discipline within Carlsbad.”
Would have voted yes on the May 2026 resolution to fly the Pride flag; he says he attended that meeting and spoke in favor, and spoke for the Juneteenth flag the same night. Supports the district continuing with no parental-notification policy, with a qualifier: any approach would likely need safeguards where a student's mental health rises to a risk of physical harm.
“it's important for our district to recognize our history, the good, the bad, and the ugly, and to support groups in our schools today that may not feel fully supported.”
Says the district's immigration policy and the Board Policy 1445 language should be easy for families to find online — "no question." If an immigration agent comes to campus, teachers should contact administration immediately and escalate so the district deals with law enforcement; he would not require teachers to physically intervene, though he says he personally would.
Not found. No campaign website, social media, candidate questionnaire, forum appearance, or press interview was located. He filed a candidate statement that will appear in the county voter pamphlet.
Not found. No campaign website, social media, candidate questionnaire, forum appearance, or press interview was located. He filed a candidate statement that will appear in the county voter pamphlet.
Not found. No campaign website, social media, candidate questionnaire, forum appearance, or press interview was located. He filed a candidate statement that will appear in the county voter pamphlet.
Not found. No campaign website, social media, candidate questionnaire, forum appearance, or press interview was located. He filed a candidate statement that will appear in the county voter pamphlet.
Not found. No campaign website, social media, candidate questionnaire, forum appearance, or press interview was located. He filed a candidate statement that will appear in the county voter pamphlet.
Where we stand: propositions and measures
While Justice Works does not endorse any candidates, we do share our views on ballot measures and how they advance or create barriers for our advocacy priorities. Each position below is tested against our five priorities: housing affordability, food security, police reform, LGBTQIA+ protection, and immigrant protection. We did not take a position on every measure. Measures not listed here, and any marked "no position," we leave to you.
Two priorities have nothing to grade this year. We checked all fourteen propositions and every local measure: there is no policing measure on this ballot and no LGBTQIA+ measure. Those are real absences, worth knowing when you decide where your attention goes.
Every voter in Oceanside, Vista, San Marcos, and Carlsbad sees the statewide and county measures. Oceanside voters also decide two city measures, and voters in the Vista Unified School District decide a school bond. Vista, San Marcos, and Carlsbad have no city measures this year.
Statewide propositions
The propositions run 1–5 and then jump to 37–45. Nothing is missing from your ballot; that is how the Secretary of State numbered them.
Housing bond
$11.25 billion in bonds, $10 billion of it for housing, including $1.15 billion for supportive housing and $750 million to preserve existing affordable homes. It is the only measure on this ballot that builds homes for people experiencing housing instability, including those in our pantry line.
Keep the high-earner income tax
Not a new tax. It makes permanent the top-earner rates already in place, set to expire in 2031, keeping $5–15 billion a year for schools and health care. Letting it lapse means cuts that land on our neighbors first.
Voter ID and citizenship verification
Requires government-issued ID to vote in person and an ID number on mail ballots, and requires elections officials to verify voters' citizenship against government databases the measure never names. Database matching misflags naturalized citizens, and the measure never says what happens to a voter who can't be matched. It would cost tens of millions to low hundreds of millions a year to solve a problem the state has not shown exists. Its largest funder is an out-of-state donor at $10.5 million; the ACLU of California, the League of Women Voters, and Common Cause oppose it. Our immigrant neighbors who are citizens should not have to prove it twice.
One-time tax on billionaires
A one-time 5% tax on net worth above $1 billion: 90% to health care, 10% to education, food assistance, and administration. It is the only statewide measure that names food assistance, and it is aimed at backfilling the federal Medicaid cuts now hitting California.
State audits of new special taxes
Sounds like good government; functions as a brake. It adds a state review step before voter-initiated taxes can even qualify for the ballot, and it comes from the same committee funding Prop 42. Oversight of public money is good. A new veto point over voters is not.
Ban on personal property and wealth taxes
Written to cancel Prop 40, now and permanently. If both pass, the one with more votes likely prevails and the fight moves to court.
Two-thirds vote for citizen-initiated local taxes
Raises the threshold for local special taxes placed on the ballot by petition from a majority to two-thirds — the exact route Measure B, the county health and safety tax, used, and the route cities use to fund homeless services and housing trust funds. It takes effect January 1, 2027, so it spares that measure and blocks every one after. A minority should not be able to stop a majority from funding its own neighbors.
San Diego County measures
Independent ethics, budget, and audit offices
Creates an Independent Ethics Commission, Independent Budget Analyst, and Independent Program Auditor, allows the Board to appoint the Public Defender, and requires public spending and performance data. That is accountability with teeth, and the Board of Supervisors is the body that sets the Sheriff's budget. It also extends supervisors' term limits from two to three; we would have preferred that on its own line, but it does not outweigh the rest.
"Protect San Diego County's Health and Safety Act"
About $400–450 million a year for health care access, food security, childcare, wildfire prevention, Tijuana River cleanup, and emergency response — written to replace what federal cuts are taking away. The ordinance names those purposes and bars spending on officials' salaries, executive bonuses, lobbying, or county office construction, with an oversight committee and annual audits.
Oceanside measures
Prevailing wage and project labor agreements
Updates the city charter so Oceanside stays eligible for state infrastructure money and can require fair wages on city projects. Wages are housing policy: a worker paid a prevailing wage can afford to live in the city they build.
Additional half-cent city sales tax
A second half-cent on top of the Measure X half-cent voters renewed in 2024 — ten years, about $20 million a year, taking Oceanside to 9.25% if Measure B also passes. Like every California sales tax, it doesn't apply to groceries, prescriptions, diapers, or menstrual products.
Two things decide it. First, it is a general tax: the project list is a promise, not a commitment, and a future council can spend the money on anything. That is what separates it from Measure B, the county measure we support — not that one is regressive and the other isn't. Both are. Measure S has an oversight committee and audits too, but oversight of a general tax can report where the money went; it cannot say where the money must go.
Second, the largest single project cited is a police headquarters of more than $100 million. We have organized for years for enforceable accountability at the Oceanside Police Department, and we won't fund that building before we get it.
Worth knowing: no one filed an argument in favor of Measure S, not even the council that placed it on the ballot 5–0. An argument against was filed.
Vista Unified
$543 million school facilities bond
Repairs aging schools without raising the current tax rate. The levy is $58 per $100,000 of assessed value, roughly $31 million a year while the bonds are outstanding, starting in 2028; total debt service is not stated in the ballot question. It needs 55% to pass. The board authorized it unanimously, though Trustee Sue Martin raised concerns about how the last bond, Measure LL, was distributed across schools. Schools serve our families, and this is a decision for Vista parents, not for us.
Sources · Measure descriptions draw on the Legislative Analyst's Office, the Secretary of State, the San Diego County Registrar of Voters, and the Oceanside City Clerk.
How this guide was made
This guide compiles findings from the public record for candidates in local, regional, and federal races. Each entry reflects a stated position or a recorded vote, accompanied by a verified source, without endorsement or subjective evaluation. When no public record exists for a candidate, this guide clearly states that the record is empty.
The evidence standard
Nothing here is inferred from party registration, occupation, endorsement, or general disposition. If we lack sufficient background detail and are not confident in our understanding of a candidate’s position, we do not report anything.
How the research was done
Parallel research passes, conducted by AI, and reviewed and corroborated by humans. Sources: House roll-call and bill records for the two federal races; official council and county board minutes and legislative databases (Legistar for Oceanside and San Marcos; city clerk portals elsewhere); city clerk candidate logs and filed candidate statements; candidate campaign websites fetched directly; local press (The Coast News, Voice of San Diego, KPBS, inewsource, North County Pipeline, Times of San Diego, North County Daily Star, North Coast Current, NBC 7, 10News, qVoice News); party and organizational endorsement pages; and the certified ballot measure text from the Registrar. Since September 2026 the guide also carries direct candidate responses to the Justice Works questionnaire on these five priorities, sent by email to every candidate for whom an address could be found. Where a candidate answers, the answer is quoted verbatim, dated, and marked "Stated to Justice Works"; where it differs from the candidate's public record, both are printed, and the questions themselves are printed alongside it.
Roll-call quality varies by city
Roll-call quality varies sharply by city. Oceanside's Legistar minutes are the strongest records in this set — machine-readable, directly linkable, and they name individual voters; every Oceanside vote in this guide is sourced to them. San Marcos and Vista publish no machine-readable roll calls: San Marcos's Legistar API stores no vote data and its minutes are scanned images, and Vista's minutes sit in a Laserfiche portal that returns 403; Carlsbad's minutes are likewise unreachable. Every individual-vote attribution in those three cities therefore rests on contemporaneous journalism, or on arithmetic where a five-member council's tally plus named dissenters makes an individual vote logically necessary — and the guide says which, each time.
Verification
The information in this guide was verified by humans who corroborated the data with primary sources. If we do not have sufficient background detail and are not confident in our understanding of a candidate’s position, we do not report anything.
What we could not reach
Read these before treating any “Not found” on this page as final.
| Blocked resource | Consequence |
|---|---|
| All filed candidate statements in Oceanside, Vista, San Marcos and Carlsbad are scanned image PDFs with no text layer | The only self-authored public statement by roughly a third of these candidates is unreadable by any automated tool. A person opening these in a browser is the single highest-value remaining task in this project. URLs are listed in Part 5. |
| Carlsbad minutes (Laserfiche, records.carlsbadca.gov) — requires cookies/JS | No Carlsbad roll call in this document is sourced to official minutes. All are from contemporaneous journalism. Village Plaza, the January 2024 rezoning, and COPPS all lack a full recorded tally. |
| Vista minutes, municipal code, and campaign finance (all Laserfiche) | Green's and O'Donnell's encampment votes are established by arithmetic, not by name. The Community Safety and Due Process Resolution number is unknown. No campaign finance data was obtained for any Vista candidate. |
| NetFile campaign finance portals (Oceanside aid=OCN, Carlsbad aid=CAR, San Marcos MRCS) — JavaScript apps | Money figures appear only where a candidate published them. Most are "not retrieved," not "none exists." |
| SANDAG agenda portal (pub-sandag.escribemeetings.com) — 403 | The ARJIS question could not be closed. See Part 4. |
| Oceanside ballot-argument PDFs — scanned images, egress-blocked for OCR | Who signed the argument against Measure S is still unknown. |
